Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Centrism and Lieberman: The Haox that is

I have gotten all sorts of questions about Lieberman and centrism and why he sucks so much.

I think sometimes other people say it best. So I just have to post the whole thing.

This post by Kos of Daily Kos, is right on. Also David Sirota, you just have to read his stuff. He is spot on with what is going on in this country.
Joe Lieberman and his apologists have two potent weapons in their battle against Lamont. The first is incumbency. Although sometimes, um, it's not so great:

We'll start with an introduction of Senator Lieberman by a veteran at the Memorial Day parade in Waterbury earlier today:

Jospeph Lieberman has served, he's in his 18th year. And, ummm, as the expression goes, `maybe we'll keep him there until he gets it right.'

I wouldn't call that intro "warm" or "glowing" or even "positive". But Jomentum must take what he can get, I suppose.

His other big advantage is the perception (and it's just that) that this is somehow a battle against Lieberman's "moderation". Apparently, walking a parade route with a Republican congresswoman is Joe's way to show he's a "moderate". As is his support for the Iraq War, his support for George Bush's judges (as part of the "gang of 14"), his opposition to emergency contraception for rape victims in hospitals, his tedious moralizing about Clinton's infidelities, etc.

David Sirota addresses this fiction:

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman says we can see that in today's Washington "A Democrat is considered centrist to the extent that he does what Mr. Lieberman does: lends his support to Republican talking points, even if those talking points don't correspond at all to what most of the public wants or believes." Krugman is right - but as I document in my new book Hostile Takeover it goes even deeper. Washington's definition of "centrism" is not just about promoting those who capitulate to Republicans, but more broadly, those who genuflect to the Establishment and support the hostile takeover of our government.

No matter how far out on the fringe of public opinion you may be, you are billed as a "centrist", a "moderate" or "in the mainstream" in our nation's capital if you serve as a mouthpiece for powerful interests who bathe politicians in cash, lend your support to these interests' pet causes, perpetuate their dishonest agendas, and keep telling the public that the Establishment's goals are the public's goals - even when polls clearly shows they are not. This paradigm is everywhere. Lieberman keeps getting fawned over as a "moderate"; out-of-touch, war-mongering Beltway pundits are being lauded as supposedly tough "moderates"; and corporate-funded think tanks pushing extremist economic and foreign policy agendas are applauded by pundits as "moderate" saviors. The propaganda is ubiquitous - and it goes the other way, too.

That's right, in Washington, you are labeled "liberal," "extremist" or "outside the mainstream" if you actually challenge power, debunk dishonest agendas with facts, and remind the public that the Beltway is deliberately ignoring what the vast majority of Americans want from their government. Moveon still gets slandered as supposedly out of the mainstream for its opposition to the war - even though polls show the public is just as vehemently opposed to the war. The netroots is constantly harangued by Beltway pundits as ultra "liberal" - even though the positions it supports in trying to get the Democratic Party to actually stand up for ordinary citizens is right in the center of public opinion data.

Washington, in short, deliberately tries to marginalize forces of change by slandering those forces as outside the "center" That propaganda system, not surprisingly, selects for people who refuse to challenge power. This explains why we have so many unspectacular, mealy-mouthed, power-fearing politicians on both sides of the aisle in Congress (and also why there are more outspoken voices in statehouses where this propaganda system is less pronounced). But it also explains why there is so much anger at Washington brewing throughout the country. After so many years of Washington lying to people about what the "center" supposedly is, Americans are waking up.

Everytime I hear someone blather about "moderate" or "centrist" I harken back to this:

John Podesta, president of the progressive Center for American Progress (CAP), faced pointed questions from lawmakers at last Thursday's New Democrat Coalition (NDC) meeting about an inflammatory e-mail his organization sent to liberal activists and bloggers.

In a March 9 e-mail, David Sirota, a fellow at CAP, accused 16 pro-business Democrats of supporting bankruptcy-reform legislation because they received political contributions from the commercial banks and credit-card companies that stand to benefit if the legislation becomes law.

The e-mail coursed through the blogosphere and generated angry phone calls from liberal activists to the offices of the 16 centrist Democrats. Sirota, a former minority spokesman for the House Appropriations Committee, criticized 16 of the 20 Democrats who wrote Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) March 7 urging him to bring bankruptcy reform to the House floor [...]

According to an aide familiar with the meeting, one lawmaker said, "There is a school of thought out there that we should `shoot all the centrists,' so John, are you of that school or do you want us to just go ahead and shoot ourselves now?"

This incident rests in my mind as the consumate example of the fiction of the "centrist" label. I remember it as if it was yesterday, and I remember exactly what we were asking of those members of the NDC:

"What, exactly, is 'centrist' about the bankruptcy bill?"

Was it supported by a majority of the American people, putting it squarely in the political mainstream? Nope. It was a corporate giveaway to the credit card industry. Nothing more. Nothing less. People like me and Sirota and countless others pleaded to the NDC to explain why they called the bill "centrist", we promised to lay off once they exlained themselves, but we never got a single answer. Not one.

Because they couldn't. There is nothing "centrist" about the bankruptcy bill, just as much of what passes as "centrism" in DC is nothing of the sort.

Sirota is dead on.

So is Lieberman a "centrist"? Well, in the DC formulation of the word, sure. He's well-entrenched in the DC establishment, he's a corporate lobbyist's wet dream, he cheerleads military adventures abroad without shouldering any of the hardship, and he's quick to abandon party loyalty (and principles) for an opportunity to earn kudos from George Bush and Sean Hannity.

Under any rational definition of "centrist", Lieberman wouldn't qualify.

But really, there is nothing rational about DC or it's media establishment.

Monday, May 29, 2006

Memorial Day

I was watching the Bridge on the River Kwai; it’s a 1957 WWII movie about some prisoner of war soldiers building a bridge for their Japanese Captures. It was one of my Grandfather’s favorite movies.

There is this scene where the head British Officer is demanding treatment that is required under the Geneva Convention that Japan signed. And the Japanese officer betrayed as the villain throws it down and says this is war, I set what is right,

“You speak to me of code? What code? The coward's code! What do you know of the soldier's code, of Bushido?”

That seems to be the arguments of the Bush Administration. That I make the rules, because the rule for Guantanamo Bay, the Rules at Abu Ghraib, in interrogations; Even though we are signatories of the Geneva Convention, and the elected Senate passed a bill expressly forbidding torture, I will torture because it is what I believe we should do.

This is so un-American, and this Memorial Day remember dangerous for our own troops. The moral high ground that we could rightly claim on the treatment of enemy combatants was the highest defense for the treatment of our captured troops. We could always say, your friends, family are being treated with the utmost respect, isn’t it best you treat us the same?

There is a reason the people who actually served in the Armed Services are so expressly against the torture of our captures.

The scene where we hold contempt for those that flout treatment of people not by the Geneva convention was presented that way for a reason. BECAUSE IT IS EVIL.

In fighting this war we must not loose the values that made us the great country that we are. Bush is claiming to be protecting our skin while destroying our soul.

And this Memorial Day I say enough is enough. My mother, (although wholly unlikely) could be captured, and I want to know she will get fair treatment. He is endangering our troops. Among a list of other actions that neglect and defame our troops, this action may prove to be the most costly in the long run and in wars of the future.

Just Remeber what the ChickenHawks did when their country needed them to serve:
Via Daily Kos
  • President George W. Bush - served four years of a six years Nat'l Guard commitment, some say after daddy's friends pulled some strings to keep him out of Vietnam. The circumstances of his early separation from state-side service are still controversial (details)
  • Karl Rove, occasional Deputy Chief of Staff and alleged full time smear artist, escaped the draft and did not serve
  • VP Dick Cheney - several deferments, by marriage and timely fatherhood
  • Former VP Chief of Staff I. Lewis Scooter Libby - did not serve
  • Secretary of State and former NSA Condaleeza Rice - did not serve
  • Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist - did not serve.
  • Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert - did not serve.
  • Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay - did not serve
  • House Majority Whip Roy Blunt - did not serve
  • Majority Whip Mitch McConnell - did not serve
  • Rick Santorum, third ranking Republican in the Senate - did not serve.
  • Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott - did not serve
  • Rush Limbaugh - did not serve
  • Sean Hannity - did not serve
  • Pat Buchanan - did not serve
  • Ann Coulter - did not serve
  • Ralph Reed - did not serve
  • Bill O'Reilly - did not serve
  • Michael Savage - did not serve
  • Bill Kristol - did not serve
Thanks to Doonsburry for Reminding us the Cost of this war:


Labels: , , ,

Sunday, May 28, 2006

The Sexiest Vegetarian

As you can remember from this post here: I voted for the sexiest Vegetarian... and one of them won. I think its great I love Kristen Bell's character and she seems very nice.

Here is GOVeg.com's Press Release:
POP ICON PRINCE AND VERONICA MARS STAR KRISTEN BELL ARE VOTED ‘WORLD’S
SEXIEST VEGETARIANS'

Thousands of Votes Cast at PETA.org for Celebrities Who Exude Both Passion and Compassion

New York — The veggie voters have spoken, and PETA is pleased to announce that Grammy-winning rock royal Prince and the “veggie Venus” of Veronica Mars, Kristen Bell, have been selected the 2006 winners of PETA’s “World’s Sexiest Vegetarians” poll. Red-carpet runners-up include V for Vendetta star Natalie Portman (proof that “V” is also for “veggie vixen”), desperately hot housewife Nicollette Sheridan, Brokeback Mountain beauty Anne Hathaway, INXS lead singer J.D. Fortune, TV Guide hottie Michael Ausiello, and Walk the Line’s dashing “Johnny Cash,” Joaquin Phoenix. More than 40,000 people voted in the poll on PETA.org.

Both of this year’s winners are more than just sexy vegetarians — they’re also active animal lovers. Going vegetarian was an easy choice for brainy beauty Kristin Bell, who says, “I have always been an animal lover. I had a hard time disassociating the animals I cuddled with — dogs and cats, for example — from the animals on my plate, and I never really
cared for the taste of meat. I always loved my Brussels sprouts!”
I love the sprouts to...

Saturday, May 27, 2006

Review: The Da Vinci Code Movie

I think I have to preface my discussion on the Da Vinci Code with an explanation of my feelings on Christianity. You can find some of my past thoughts on it on my webpage here, how Jesus was an early death penalty victim here, and my thoughts of Jesus' life here.

I have a love hate relationship with Jesus having been on both ends of his legacy. On the negative, I have been terrorized and disowned by my family, even beaten in his name. From an early age of 3 I was told by aunts, uncles and cousins that I was going to hell. Told that the legacy of Jesus, is the lesson that everyone must be armed to protect themselves.

But I have also felt my spirit lifted and given purpose by Jesus’ life, especially the more I learn about it. Not religiously, but by the man and the guidance of how he lived his life. The lessons of a gifted life lived in the very image of G-d (for Christians obviously as G-d, but as a Jew in the image) a lesson embodied and emulated by Gandhi, Mother Theresa, Dr. King, Mandela, etc.

Anyway the Movie, the Da Vinci Code. It was just ok. And that saddens me greatly because for me the movie is so important. For some reason they changed things that didn’t need to be changed, like it didn’t add anything and didn’t shorten the movie… It made no sense.

The other major change is that Tom Hanks, who played the main character, Robert Langdon ends up being an advocate for the Catholic Church’s talking points, even disregarding the well documented and researched facts about the founding of the church to make obvious concessions to the Catholic Church.

I mean the actual plot of the movie as a thriller moving forward is not that great, why make that the purpose of the movie? As a thriller it is just ok. What makes the Da Vinci Code so unique and so powerful is the important questions it raises about religion the values of all the major western religions while making it very accessible even somewhat interesting.

The importance of women, and the subsequent focus on their subjugation and repression as being key to the success of the church is so fascinating and raises important questions for religion and religious feminists (which I have the pleasure of being friends with many) to deal with today.

Also the reality of the politicization of Christianity, and that many of the values Christians take for granted if not hold as the very word of G-d were merely decisions of men. And the Gospels, which are the memories of people written down decades after the life of Jesus as his words, and chosen by other people decades later as the ones to keep while disregarding other Gospels by other seemingly equal apostles as their memories of Jesus’ life and words. It seems sad that people are forced to feel subjugated, oppressed, demagogued, dehumanized, even killed based on that.

It has bewildered me further, that women, who so obviously should be worshipped and admired places in our society as keepers of life, and often (although obviously not exclusively) the givers of true male pleasure could hold such a demonized place in our society. The Da Vinci Code gave an important avenue for exploring these and many other issues. The movie failed to give these issues a proper airing, if anything the concessions to Church positions without further discussions only shortening them to make it sound like the Church is the final and ultimate RIGHT position just cheapened the point. It could have been so much more and wasn’t… for that I was very disappointed.

Saturday, May 20, 2006

Stop the Jomentum

Bush's little lap dog needs to be stopped. Joe Lieberman continues to support Bush's bad policies and give cover for conservative intitiatives as "bi-partisan" because his dumbass supports them.

That is why I am supporting Ned Lamont. I gave him a little money and signed up to help. You can to. And CARI THIS IS FOR YOU AUGUST 8th GO VOTE.

Anyone in CT can. We need to beat Lieberman

Go to Ned Lamont.com give some money and\or your support:



Friday, May 19, 2006

Bringing Back the A-TEAM

I just watched the best hour of TV. BRING BACK THE A-TEAM on England's Channel 4. I still have the chills.

The shows premise is for presenter Justin Lee Collins who is awsome, bring back together the Members of the famous 80's hit the A-Team.

The show ran from 1983 to 1987 and suddenly ended. I LOVED THE SHOW. I used to carry around my Mr. T doll everywhere when I was 4 and 5. He was the epitome of cool and a positive Black roll model.

The show itself, I have learned was meant to be the mans mans show and yet accessible to kids. In 4 years only ONE person died, and that was the very last episode. It really was just a great show.

Unfortunately George Peppard AKA Col. John "Hannibal" Smith passed away in 1994. But Collins was successful in not only meeting every surviving member, INCLUDING THE T. but getting them into the same room for the first time in 20 years.

It was just awsome, I am still in its afterglow.

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Action on Darfur, 7 Congress people arrested at Embassy

I think this is so great. And I am so proud the Congression Black Caucus did this, I think it shows the importance of this action.

7 House members arrested at Sudan embassy
FREDERIC J. FROMMER
Associated Press

Seven members of the Congressional Black Caucus were arrested at the Embassy of Sudan on Tuesday while protesting conditions in the nation's Darfur region.

"We will not tolerate genocide," said Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., the caucus chairman. "We are saying to Sudan this has got to stop."

The seven were taken away in Secret Service cars after blocking the entrance to an embassy. They were released a short time later after paying $50 fines.

Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., wore a green T-shirt that read, "End the Darfur Genocide."

Lee said she visited the Darfur region, where "I saw the desperation in the eyes of the people."

The Sudanese government and main Darfur rebel group signed an agreement on May 5 to end Darfur's three-year civil war, which has killed at least 180,000 and displaced some 2 million people. But there have been several attacks since the signing, U.N. officials said.

Khidir Haroun Ahmed, Sudan's ambassador to the United States, called the protest "unfortunate."

"We think the effort should be exerted toward persuading the other two rebel movements to sign the peace agreement," he said. A splinter faction of the rebel Sudan Liberation Movement and the rebel Justice and Equality Movement have resisted pressure to join the agreement.

Tuesday's protesters said they want an end to the violence; accountability for those responsible; U.N. peacekeepers; distribution of food to help prevent starvation; and full implementation of the peace agreement.

"Enough is enough," said Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga. "We must do all we can to stop the violence."

The other lawmakers arrested Tuesday were Reps. Al Green, D-Texas, Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, Gwen Moore, D-Wis., and District of Columbia Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Democrat.

The lawmakers held the rally on the steps of the embassy with the intention of getting arrested. The Secret Service was given advance notice, and let the lawmakers take questions for several minutes before arresting them. Last month, five other House members were arrested after a similar protest at the embassy.

Darfur has been torn by violence since rebel groups made up of ethnic Africans rose up against the Arab-led Khartoum government in 2003. The government is accused of responding by unleashing Arab militias known as the Janjaweed who have been accused of some of the war's worst atrocities. Khartoum denies backing the Janjaweed but has said it will try to rein them in since the deal was signed.

The Champion's League Final

Tonight was the European Champion's League Football Final in Paris (that soccer for all the American leaders) between Arsenal and Barcelona. Arsenal is the North London team and its grounds are like five minutes from where I live. I am a Man U fan, cause that was the only games we could get back home, but being here, I definately was routing for Arsenal.

However I am such a fan of FC Barcelona because they are owned entirely by their fans. Unlike the other teams which are run for profit, by the extremely profitted, the people own the team and benefit from it. They have been successful to. Having the Best Player in the world Ronaldinho won 2 consequtive Spanish League Titles and now after tonight the European Cup.

But the game was actually very disappointing. The game started off promising. You would worry that both teams would be nervous and defensive. But Arsenal came out strong and within 2 minutes their star, Thierry Henry almost scored on a great shot. Theirry is French grew up in the Paris suburbs to it looked like a match in heaven for him.

But within 18 minutes a first part dominated by Arsenal, their goalkeeper Jens Lehmann was sent off and a Barcelona goal was disallowed. Everyone agreed what was best was to allow the play to continue and keep the game which was starting out to be one of the best (the English commentator of almost all 50 years words not mine). Lehmann made an amazing penalty kick save in the Semi-finals to put Arsenal into the Final.

IN 50 YEARS OF CHAMPIONS LEAGUE FOOTBALL NO ONE HAD EVER BEEN SENT OFF. The reason why is obvious. It ruins the game.


THE REFEREE ADMITTED IT WAS A MISTAKE. Maybe in a normal game you think of red carding that player, but not this game, not the finals it should not be decided by a Referee's Decision.

THIS SUCKED because for the next 70 minutes it would be 10 vs. 11. The team with 10 will never win. At best Arsenal could hope for a tie. Barcelona basically controlled the ball because they could just play a game of takeaway.

Amazingly Arsenal scored right after that off a free kick on Sol Campbell header.

But then it was all Barcelona, and after amazing saves and just luck, the damns finally broke and Barcelona scored 2 goals in 5 minutes.

What sucked is that even that first goal the Player Samuel Eto appeared to be offsides.

Overall the game was just poorly officiated. It was awful and Arsenal was just left feeling cheated. I don't blame them. It certainly appeared that way.

I loved Thierry Henry's interview after the game when asked if the best team won he simply said, "No." On the Refereeing, "We can be proud, we can be more than proud, but, I'm sorry, some of the refereeing today was horrendous."

"It's just sad. You can lose, but to lose like that."

And its really a shame because Barcelona also was cheated. Which is something else Henry rightly pointed out. They didn't need help, the Refereeing was just awful. What would have happened if they played the game 11 vs. 11. Barcelona will always be cheated from a real victory.

It just makes no sense the refree making himself apart of the game.

My favorite part is that the give out LOSER MEDALS: "Here's your medal for second place." and they have to stay out after loosing to get it.

PLUS THEY HAVE TO WALK BY THE TROPHY as if it were mocking them. I would have pushed it over. It seems really wrong. Frankly for all the tlak of Soccer hooligans and how tough Football bfans are and all that I was very dissappointed. If the Philadelphia Eagles had lost because of a clearly bad call like that they would have rioted. Throwing everything inlcuding the things nailed down. When the Sixers lost to the Lakers in the NBA Championship in Philadelphia the championship ceremony had to be held in the locker room because the Philadelphia fans were throwing stuff and booing.

It is that dogmatic dedication to our teams that is why I love Philadelphia fans. Not as we are portrayed stupid brutes, but rather real fans, who know the games and love our teams and refuse to stay quite, be "sportsman" as our teams our robbed or treated unfairly. We do not love our teams just in the good, but through and through and we cheer and boo as our love affair with our teams entail.

After that game I was actually disappointed by Arsenal fans reaction. And London Mayor should ban Norwegian referee Terje Hauge from ever coming to the city. Or something like that. That is dedication.

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

David Sirota Gets it

David Sirota Gets its right

Go read the whole article its worth finding out what is happening to American Democracy. And what I can see here in London, not just America:
Chicago Sun-Times - 5/7/06

There’s a lot of talk these days about political “polarization,” “red and blue” America, and increased partisanship. It makes for a good storyline, for sure. But it hides a very simple truth: American politics is not polarized and it is not driven by partisanship - it is governed by a very tightly-knit, bipartisan consensus that makes sure every policy debate ends with one or another outcome that benefits the Big Money interests that bankroll political campaigns.

We hear politicians tell us all the time that we live “in the greatest democracy on earth.” That implies that our government truly represents the people - yet, strangely, we see policy after policy legislated in the people’s name that serves only to enrich the already rich, and empower the already powerful. How is this possible? Because our political system is not a democracy - it is legalized bribery. Money is given to politicians for their campaigns, and those politicians return the favor through public policies once in office. And over the last thirty years, Big Money interests have used that system of legalized bribery to perform a hostile takeover of our government.

….To be sure, none of this is said out in the open. We are constantly force fed a diet of pre-packaged soundbites from politicians and pundits crafted to make us believe that public policies and the politicians who push them are working for ordinary citizens - even when they clearly are not.

Illinois’ provides us with two textbook example of how this hostile takeover operates.
The first comes from Chicago Congressman Rahm Emanuel. Coming off a four-year stint cashing in his Clinton White House experience to make millions as an investment banker, Emanuel penned a 2003 op-ed in the Wall Street Journal saying he wanted to mount “an aggressive attack on the tax code” and its most unfair provisions, and that “should start with corporate expatriates.” He claimed he was appalled that “some corporations are actually rewarded with federal contracts while they move their corporate headquarters to Bermuda.”

But that bait was soon met with a big switch. When fellow Democratic Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (CT) courageously sponsored legislation to stop government contracts from going to corporate tax cheats that abuse offshore tax havens to avoid their tax obligation, Emanuel, who is the chief fundraiser for Democrats’ reelection campaign committee, voted with Big Money interests and against the bill, helping send it down to defeat.
…But the more virulent and widespread form of corruption is what was just described: the corruption that happens every day, whereby politicians of both parties feed the public well-packaged rhetoric, and then push policies that harm ordinary citizens. This is the corruption that few ever talk about because it is so mundane. It is corruption that allows energy legislation to be written by oil companies, Medicare legislation to be written by pharmaceutical companies, and bankruptcy legislation to be written by credit card companies - all while politicians claim they are really acting in the people’s interest, all while pundits and political operatives on both sides of the aisle nod approvingly.

…Then again, we have to remember that the people who control Washington today are products of the hostile takeover. They have risen to power through the corrupt system, and they rely on that corrupt system to stay in power.

But America is clearly reaching a breaking point. Public opinion polls show that citizens are sick and tired of public policies that drive down wages, permit health care price gouging, destabilize pensions, unfairly tilt taxes and generally encourage an economic race to the bottom in what is supposed to be the wealthiest country on earth. Those polls show that citizens believe both parties are corrupt, and that America is desperate for a change.

Monday, May 15, 2006

Black Republican: Are They Really Worth Media Coverage?

Living in Washington DC for six years I got to read the slow destruction of the American institution that is the Washington Post. I love newspapers. I like my grandfather used to read 2 to 3 papers a day. But in my final year in DC I just couldn’t take it anymore and had to stop my subscription to the Post.

Its editorial board which has darted heavily to the right, was unreadable. Its editorials, nonsensical and often complete devoid of the facts in its own Newspaper. Its covers local DC the same way the London Times covers Africa. It lacks any of the muckraking journalism that made it famous.

Then I see this article online that actually made me through up in my mouth:
The Year of the Black Republican?

Oh lord, seriously?
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- When J. Kenneth Blackwell took the stage here on May 2 to claim the Republican nomination for governor, he became something more than his party's standard-bearer in a bellwether state.

The Ohio secretary of state -- a crusading conservative with an appetite for political combat -- also assumed a leading role in his party's latest effort to break the Democrats' decades-long grip on the black vote.
Yeah, the guy who actually took voting machines out of Black precincts and into white ones to make it harder for Black people to vote. Yeah a real civil rights hero… Any mention of that, or the complete hatred he deduces in the Black community? I’ll let you guess.
In Maryland, Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele, whose candidacy has benefited from his friendship with two Republican National Committee chairmen, is the party's nominee to fill the seat of retiring Democratic Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes. In Pennsylvania, former Pittsburgh Steelers star Lynn Swann is challenging Democratic Gov. Edward G. Rendell.
Yeah, Swann is a real winner. Gets rich catching a football, gets into the hall of fame, not for actual production, but because of one famous catch. He has the real background to be a Governor.
It hit bottom in 2000, when George W. Bush managed to garner just 8 percent of the votes of African Americans.
The article shouldn't underestimate Bush like that, The 2% Bush is currently getting I think is rock bottom. Well then again, I should never underestimate Republicans.
Together, they embody a new chapter in the Republican Party's often-failed efforts to appeal to African Americans, a strategy shaped by RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman, who last year apologized for the GOP's Nixon-era "Southern strategy" of exploiting white resentment over integration.

"We've gone from a model of outreach to a model of inclusion," Mehlman said. "Outreach is a top-down approach. Inclusion says, 'Let's find some really good people and encourage them to run for office.' "
Yeah, continuing to suppress Black people from voting, continuing policies that enrich the ridiculously wealthy at the expense of the poor, and sitting by while humans die in New Orleans, a winning strategy I say.
"It cuts into the Democratic base," said Columbus Mayor Michael B. Coleman. "It gives choices. And what that does is say to the Democratic Party, 'Put your money where your mouth is.' "
If only this were true. The Republicans are not a real option; unless you like voting for your own subjugation. (place Log Cabin Republicans example here)
Four years ago, post-election analyses showed the Ehrlich-Steele ticket winning 10 to 15 percent of the black vote, which did not represent a gain for the GOP.
10 to 15 percent that is news? If you represent 10 to 15 percent that’s news? 85 percent of Black people think they were shmucks. Even Vice-President Dick Cheney is more popular.
One reason, according to Dianne M. Pinderhughes, a political scientist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, is the bond between blacks and the Democratic Party created by the civil rights battles of the 1960s,
This is just stupid. Black people vote for Democrats because they are the only game in town. True starting with civil rights legislation, but they continue not because they blindly support the party that supported our rightful equality, but because they are the only party at least speaking to the concerns of our community.

THAT IS WHY REPUBLICANS FAIL IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY.

And Democrats need the support of the Black community to be an even viable party. Without our support, the party would not even be able to express opposition because their support would be so low.
"The Republicans have a longer-term view of things than we Democrats sometimes have," said Cornell Belcher, the Democratic National Committee's pollster.
This is an important point I think actually. Dems take Black people for granted. THAT IS THE REAL STORY. And Dems need to start actually DOING something for the Black community when they are in power. And our leaders in the House and Senate need to actually push to make that happen.

But we will continue to vote Democrat not when you get enough tokens to run as Republicans, or when, as this article which I found her comments borderline racist implying our stupidity, seems to believe that we in the community forget 1960’s support.
David Bositis of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, in a Democratic stronghold such as Maryland, he said, "if they saw an increase of 5 percent of the black vote, I think, they would figure they had died and gone to heaven."
Yeah that is news worth covering... Pathetic. This is the year of the Black Republican 5 percent amongst their own communities? Why not just change the name of the Washington Post to Neo-Republican Agenda: Everything the RNC believes is fit to print.

Sunday, May 14, 2006

Bush's Best Moment: Catching A Fish

At first this story is ridiculous because Bush made the comment.

But then it got better, because it turns out, HE LIED ABOUT THIS TO.

Bush's favorite moment as President is not even true.
Via Rueters
Bush's best moment in office? Reeling in big perch

BERLIN (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush told a German newspaper his best moment in more than five years in office was catching a big perch in his own lake.

"You know, I've experienced many great moments and it's hard to name the best," Bush told weekly Bild am Sonntag when asked about his high point since becoming president in January 2001.

"I would say the best moment of all was when I caught a 7.5 pound (3.402 kilos) perch in my lake," he told the newspaper in an interview published on Sunday.
Of course This turns out to be a complete fabrication:
Last weekend, Phil Deer, Jr. of Delta, Pennsylvania caught a record setting yellow perch in a pond in Harford County. The perch is the largest ever caught in Maryland and the fourth largest on record in the world. DNR confirmed the perch's size as 3 pounds, 5 ounces and 16" inches long, which eclipsed the Maryland record of 2 pounds 6.75 ounces set at Deep Creek Lake in 2003. Worldwide, Deer's fish places behind a 4 pound, 3 ounce perch caught in New Jersey in 1865; a 3 pound, 12 ounce perch caught in Michigan in 1947; and a 3 pound, 8 ounce perch caught in New York in 1982. All records are for the fresh water division.
Can he ever tell the truth?

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Arguing Like a Republican: Tom Tomorrow explains

Friday, May 12, 2006

Arguing like a Republican and the Da Vinci Code

Arguing like a Republican is simple, you don’t need to listen to what people are saying and making logical arguments against them with facts, all you have to do is attack non-important issues, NAME CALL, get defensive while trying to claim the moral high ground, and then if all else fails, demagogue someone else.

Why confuse the issues with making an actual conversation with rational arguments when you can confuse the issue with making wild accusations, trying to claim the high ground by calling names and then blaming the boogey man, Osama Bin Laden, France or even the UNITED STATES (don’t have to be an actual Republican to argue like one)

The TV is not immune to these sort of accusatory discussions.

Enter British Channel Five, and the hatchet job they did on The Da Vinci Code.

Maybe because it is a state mandated Christian Country, maybe someone there is a devout Catholic, maybe they are just mad he didn’t come on their shows, who knows. But the show was an old fashioned hatchet job, that distracts from an issue and non-important points.

It’s like they took the page right out of the FAUX channel playbook.

An architect talking about philosophy and religion; An Art historian explaining Da Vinci’s Religious Affiliation (he first claims that if he had any problem with the church he would not have worked for them, then claimed that the church was the only source of work for painters at that time, then claimed that the female looking John in the last supper is because he was gay and thus had more effeminate men. I don’t know where to begin with that homophobic comment, but if he were gay, could he really be a devout catholic?)

Brown’s view is only represented in the first 20 minute segment and quickly laughed off by the voice over commentator.

SPOILER ALERT. THE PARTS OF THE PLOT ARE ITALICISZED.


The crux of the program is hat Brown used old myths that may or may not be true to further the plot of his novel. That there is no proof that Priory of Sion still exist; nor that that Knights Templar found the Holy Grail; nor that Mary Magdalene had babies.


Of course not, these are literary leaps of faith that cannot be proven, but are used by Brown to further a mystery and sell books. To make his REAL GROUNDBREAKING CLAIMS, accessible to the most un-theologically inclined reader.

THE POINT, is the idea that the early church destroyed human understanding of the equality of men and women; destroying respect for women the “sacred feminine,” to further its interests dominated by males. Further that the male dominated society we see today is the result of that lie.

That Jesus who clearly was the visionary of visionaries bestowed upon his wife, Mary Magdalene the work of furthering his message. The reason these four scriptures were chosen as, “the word of G-d,” and not any of the numerous other gospels was because these best furthered the interests of the early church creators. That the creation of the modern church and converting of a King, was a pragmatic political answer to the danger of the rising subversive of a fellow human Jesus.

Even more fantastical, that the idea that he is the Christ was left up to a vote. Now that is a discussion I want to see.

But alas a hatchet job, a FAUX report if you will is not about a real discussion.

You don’t have to believe me, nor Brown, but I think he raises important questions that we all must grapple with. GO READ THE BOOK, decide for yourself, but don’t let programs like these tell you what is or is not true, and don’t let them confuse the issue with what is not the important questions.

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Seriously, More Tax Cuts?

What is wrong with Republicans? A war in Iraq that is costing the US taxpayers $101.8 Billion by the end of 2006, record deficits that my children will be trying to payoff after Clinton LEFT A SURPLUS, People in New Orleans without homes, millions of Americans without healthcare, quality job creation non-existent, and they give tax cuts to the rich? Via AP
WASHINGTON - House Republican leaders are ready to move forward on tax breaks worth $70 billion over five years to investors and some middle-income families now that they've sorted out a disagreement among themselves.

The breakthrough Tuesday set up a vote in the House late Wednesday.

The Senate is expected to clear the bill Thursday, which would let President Bush achieve one of his top tax priorities and give his GOP allies on Capitol Hill a victory in times of sagging poll numbers.

The bill offers a two-year extension of the reduced 15 percent tax rate for capital gains and dividends, currently set to expire at the end of 2008.
How do people not see how evil this is? How do they not see that the Republican party is not working for them… it is working for the uber-rich.
"What we do today protects jobs, protects the incomes of our people, strengthens America's economy and protects our future," Rep. Nancy Johnson (news, bio, voting record), R-Conn, said Wednesday.
Really, tax cuts for the rich will create jobs? How? American Progress Reports on Federal Reserve Report:
Federal Reserve economists have found these investment tax cuts haven't boosted the stock market
And why would they? Why would tax cuts for the rich, for their investments spur the economy? They do not spend this money, they do not create economic growth. They mostly save it, put it away, accumulate more wealth.

And what about Tax cuts that might actually help the middle class?
The second bill is to contain a number of widely backed tax breaks, among them a tuition tax deduction, a tax break for teachers who buy their own school supplies and a research and development tax credit for businesses.
So that way, they can pass the first one, and hold up the second one… seeming more fiscally sound while giving away our futures to the uber-rich. via Americna Progress
"The average tax cut for the 20 percent of households in the middle of the income spectrum would be just $20." Meanwhile, "For those with incomes above $1 million, the average tax cut would be $42,000." Overall, "the three-quarters of households with incomes below $75,000 would receive just 5 percent of the benefits" (no more than $110 each).

While the poor and most of the middle class get virtually nothing from the new tax package, some big corporations with overseas operations make out handsomely. Companies like GE and Citicorp save $4.8 billion through a new tax break "aimed at corporations that earn profits overseas through their financing arms."
What is wrong with these people? Have they no shame at all?

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

The Stephanie Miller Show's Immigration Debate

The Stephanie Miller show is a left leaning show that is broadcast on many liberal radio stations. While it is not an Air America Radio show, it is one of the most popular and growing shows. She takes sometime getting used to, she likes to say that she is to left for conservatives and to politically incorrect for the left.

I think she is good at making me laugh at what would otherwise make me cry in the Bush Administration. It is not in depth, but it is Hilarious and biting. They have been having a debate on Immigration. One of the shows producers, while a Democrat, believes as to many do, that Immigrants are simply breaking the law. And while we should do something with them, his point is first and for most that they are criminals, this is my letter:

Dear Mama, (That is what she likes to go by on the show)

Chris is WRONG WRONG WRONG,

I have to apologize, I podcast your show from London, England where I am getting my Masters and therefore am a little behind in listening to your show. But having to listen last week to Chris blather on about the law was just too much to take.

IF THERE WAS A LEGAL WAY for these immigrants to come to America that would be one thing.

But there is no legal way for low-skilled Latino people to enter our country legally.

And yet the system WE, the U.S. created is one where these HUMAN BEINGS cannot make a living in their own country because of NAFTA, and cannot come to our country legally.

What should they do, camp out on the border and starve with their children until we find a way to bring them into our country legally or until we in our benevolence solve Mexico’s problems?

This whole idea that we are a nation of laws and people should come here legally is JUST STUPID. CHRIS IS WRONG WRONG WRONG.

They system is not accidental. We created a system whereby people cannot make a living in their country, and cannot come to ours legally, thus forcing them into doing jobs at inhumane wages and unjust hours; to the benefit of big business.

We need to bring these PEOPLE out of the shadows of our society so that they are paid fair wages and so AMERICANS can have access to these jobs at living wages.

JUST SAYING THEY ARE ILLEGAL and are at fault; is DEMONIZING families who were left with no other choice.

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Study US Mothers Deserve $134,121

Women are undervalued in our society. A letover from the early creations of judeo-christian western society. And it need not be that way. In fact PEOPLE who do many so called "menial jobs" are under appreciated. For some reason, picking our frui, building our roads and buildings, or even creating artistic works of art are valued less then people who spend all day talking to students, administering the law, screwing up large corporations, or creating law.

Actually producing something is valued less then thinking about it.

ABC NEWS
has this report, that Mothers are another group who are completely undervlaued in the US. In Japan, raising a child is considered a worthy job, important to the fabric of society.. In truth many societies have vlaued it as THE most important job.

But in western societies, we not only don't value motherhood, we are now expecting them to "make a living, DO SOMETHING, to mkae money." Rasing a child is not considered doing somehting worth our monetary recognition.

A ppor mother raising a child by her self, is to be derided, instead of supported for their importnat work. ABC NEWS article put into that perspective really shows the importance of feminism.

Study: US mothers deserve $134,121 in salary
May 3, 2006 — By Ellen Wulfhorst
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A full-time stay-at-home mother would earn $134,121 a year if paid for all her work, an amount similar to a top U.S. ad executive, a marketing director or a judge, according to a study released on Wednesday.

A mother who works outside the home would earn an extra $85,876 annually on top of her actual wages for the work she does at home, according to the study by Waltham, Massachusetts-based compensation experts Salary.com.

To reach the projected pay figures, the survey calculated the earning power of the 10 jobs respondents said most closely comprise a mother's role — housekeeper, day-care teacher, cook, computer operator, laundry machine operator, janitor, facilities manager, van driver, chief executive and psychologist.

"You can't put a dollar value on it. It's worth a lot more," said Kristen Krauss, 35, as she hurriedly packed her four children, all aged under 8, into a minivan in New York while searching frantically for her keys. "Just look at me."

Employed mothers reported spending on average 44 hours a week at their outside job and 49.8 hours at their home job, while the stay-at-home mother worked 91.6 hours a week, it showed.

An estimated 5.6 million women in the United States are stay-at-home mothers with children under age 15, according to the most recent U.S. Census Bureau data.

NOT 'JUST A MOM'

"It's good to acknowledge the job that's being done, and that it's not that these women are settling for 'just a mom,"' said Bill Coleman, senior vice president of compensation at Salary.com. "They are actually doing an awful lot."

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, some 26 million women with children under age 18 work in the nation's paid labor force.

Both employed and stay-at-home mothers said the lowest-paying job of housekeeper was their most common role, with employed mothers working 7.2 hours a week as housekeeper and stay-at-home mothers working 22.1 hours in that role.

Monday, May 08, 2006

Women are making strides in India

Women are making strides across the globe, just as they face some of the most oppressive answers by male dominated society to answer these problems. In every society, it seems just as women are demanding more rights, the oppression by men, and unfortunately often other women is increasing. No battle for freedom is ever without its backlash by a society trying to cope with these changes.

This article in Foreign Policy Association on the progress of women in India represents some of these conflicting:
NEW DELHI – A quiet revolution is growing here in the world's biggest democracy. The women of India are uniting to free themselves from centuries of gender-based restrictions, and it's made life for many both better and worse, as a recent month here revealed. The biggest change for the better, according to everyone interviewed on the subject -- from psychologists and writers to housekeepers – is that women here now have more choice in the way they live their lives. In the not so distant past, for example, girls as young as 8 and 9 were married off to start producing large families and live out their lives at the beck and call of in-laws.

Now, such early marriage takes place at 14 or 15 (legal age in India is 18 for girls, and 21 for boys), while, especially in the cities, women increasingly postpone child-bearing and even marriage to have careers. Though arranged marriages are still common in most villages, they are occurring less and less in big cities, according to Karishma, a striking young professional in marketing at the upscale Taj Mahal Hotel. Today's young women only “settle” for arranged marriages, says Karishma, “if they can't find a husband on their own.” And even in arranged marriages, she adds, “the bride can now get to know the man first and, if she doesn't like him, say no.”

Moreover, in this new climate, women are increasingly making it to the top of the career ladder, according to a cultural affairs specialist, Ayesha, at the U.S. Embassy here. “Ten years ago, there might be a woman here and there running a company,” says Ayesha, who is both married and about to give birth to her first child, “but today, one sees women CEOs and chairmen of the board.”
But as we can see these have consequences which seem to be recreating itself all over where women are making strides in societies, that have not valued them as they should.
By contrast, the "worse" side of life for women here today can still get pretty bad, with “female foeticide,” "feminicide" and even desperate suicides the focus of new laws banning both the widespread abortion of girl fetuses and testing the fetus for gender. “Missing 36 million girls in the last decade,” a page in an annual report by an advocacy group, Action India, confirms the urgency. “Stop Sex Selection, Save the Girl Child.” In some states, like Rajasthan, “infanticide got so bad,” remarked Madhu Mita Puri, a psychologist who works with disabled children, “there was going to be nobody left to marry.”

A story told by a young father, Frederic, who works as housekeeper in the home of a foreign diplomat here, illustrates the extent to which infanticide impacts on everyone's lives. For he tells how a sweeper saw a dog dragging a plastic sack along the street that, when examined, contained a baby inside – a common means of getting rid of unwanted births, explained Frederic, visibly moved.

Frederic also worries about the many women in India who are still suffering because “their in-laws are torturing them to get more dowry,” despite the fact the courts have ruled that, if a wife is abused, it now falls on the husband and in-laws to prove they are not abusing her. Until recently, it was the wife that had to prove the abuse. To illustrate some outcomes, Frederic cited a recent case where a young woman jumped from the second story of a house because “she couldn't take it any more.”
This is a terrible side effect, the desire to kill your own baby based simply on sex is an amazingly sad statement on how much engrained these gender biases go. The problem is that with the advent of women’s liberation, societies are unsure of how to adjust, this is a fundamental shift that takes time to sort itself out. Something western society is also coping with. How do we balance respect for the rights of women to be treated equally in work and value child birth as well? Where is the place for men? How do we redefine our roles?

There are always positives to these changes, and these and thousands of other questions are things I am glad we are forced to face.
On the positive side, in Gujarat State women age 70 and beyond are learning, in a special literacy program, to read and write for the first time. Elsewhere, women like Swati Chopra tutor American children calling in for online help with math to a company called Career Launcher. The first woman in India to drive a taxi recently climbed behind the wheel. And a young woman, Sarita Hedge Roy, who holds a corporate job with the Taj Hotels at their headquarters in Bombay, made these encouraging points for women in answering whether it is harder for an upper-class young woman like herself to enter the corporate world:

Sunday, May 07, 2006

Vote for the Sexiest Vegetarian

Go to GoVeg.com and you can vote for the sexiest vegetarian star.

Even if you are not a veggie I just found the list really interesting.

Chelsea Clinton (Good for her WHO KNEW), also Linda Blair, (PM Tony Blair's wife) Erykah Badu, India.Arie (both hold in it down for the sistas), Fiona Apple, Natalie Portman, Nicollette Sheridan (the Desperate Housewife), Rachael Leigh Cook.

Alec Baldwin, Carl Lewis (the Olympian),
Dick Gregory, Don Imus, G. Gordon Liddy, (these I have to say, I just didn't see coming and good for them) Leonard Nimoy, Phil Collen, Paul McCartney, Sean Astin, Tobey Maguire,
David Duchovny, Joaquin Phoenix, Jared Leto, Noah Wyle, "Weird Al" Yankovic, Woody Harrelson, Tony La Russa (The famous LA Dodges Manager)

What surprised me were all the brothas holden it down especially the rappers, talk about fighting an image:
KRS-One, Keenen Ivory Wayans, Little Richard, Omar Epps, Orlando Jones, Prince, Prodigy, Q-Tip, Ricky Williams (the only football player known to be a vegetarian), Russell Simmons, RZA,

Interestingly enough also, the male list is longer then the female list. Vegetarianism is often thought of as a "girlie thing," MEN EAT MEAT. I think its great to see all these people of different strikes and backgrounds that are veggie, and many are men.

I voted for Mos Def even though his last album was not great, I love his stuff, and
Kristen Bell of on of my favorite TV Shows Vernoica Mars

Saturday, May 06, 2006

Child Labor on the Decline

I just posted my opinion here about the need to think about where our things come from, so this report by the international labor organization that child labor is on the decline is a welcome finnding. I think history is moving toward a better world slowly... We still have work to do, but finally the scourage of child labor, which has plagued our human society since its beginning organizing itself into city-states. But in our grasp is its end. Find the Report here:
GENEVA (ILO news) - Child labour, especially in its worst forms, is in decline for the first time across the globe, the International Labour Organization (ILO) said today, in a new, cautiously optimistic report (Note 1) entitled The end of child labour: Within reach.

The ILO report also says that if the current pace of the decline were to be maintained and the global momentum to stop child labour continued, it believes child labour could feasibly be eliminated, in most of its worst forms, in 10 years.

"The end of child labour is within our reach", says Juan Somavia, Director-General of the ILO. "Though the fight against child labour remains a daunting challenge, we are on the right track. We can end its worst forms in a decade, while not losing sight of the ultimate goal of ending all child labour."

The new report says the actual number of child labourers worldwide fell by 11 per cent between 2000 and 2004, from 246 million to 218 million.

What's more, the number of children and youth aged 5-17 trapped in hazardous work decreased by 26 per cent, to reach 126 million in 2004 as opposed to 171 million in the previous estimate. Among younger child labourers aged 5-14, this drop was even more pronounced at 33 per cent, says the report.

Four years ago, the ILO issued the most comprehensive report to date on global child labour. Applying the same statistical methodology used in that report, the ILO finds a significant decline in child labour since then.


The report attributed the reduction in child labour to increased political will and awareness (Note 2) and concrete action, particularly in the field of poverty reduction and mass education that has led to a "worldwide movement against child labour". Through its International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC), the ILO assists in building national capacity to deal with child labour and providing policy advice. In addition, through direct action, the Programme over the past decade has reached some 5 million children. These initiatives have played a significant catalytic role, both in mobilizing action and demonstrating how child labour can be eliminated.

Friday, May 05, 2006

Peace Takes Courage

This 15 year old woman from Alabama is amazing. Truly inspirational what anyone can do with a creative mind. Which clearly knows no age nor geographical bounds. Go to her website, check it out, its really great.

go to http://www.peacetakescourage.com/

best videos

http://peacetakescourage.cf.huffingtonpost.com/


I love the 32% video showing what some people think of her website.

This is what she says about herself. GO TO THE WEBSITE
Peace Takes Courage is a project by Ava Lowrey. Ava is a 15 year old student and peace activist from Alabama. In Mid-March 2005, she created her first animation. Since then she has made over 70 animations, many of them about the war in Iraq. In April 2006, Cindy Sheehan wrote an article about Ava and her effort to promote peace through this website. Ava has been featured on Progressive Magazine online, MichaelMoore.com, Buzzflash.com, Truthout.org, and other sites.

Thursday, May 04, 2006

Do We Really Need the Death Penalty?

In the wake of today's news, made me think about the Death Penalty in America. I don't want to waste space debating today's decisions. If he was sentenced to death, I really wouldn't have been devastated, or even remotely upset. But I think there are broder questions that I think should be thought about.

According to the BBC, this is just a sad thought…. Why is the US lumped with these wonderful countries? These really are the countries we want to be in company with?
At least 20,000 prisoners are awaiting execution worldwide and more than 2,000 were put to death last year, a leading human rights group has said.

In its annual survey on the death penalty, Amnesty International said 94% of the 2005 executions took place in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the US.

...There were 2,148 known executions in 22 countries in 2005, Amnesty International said, down from a record level of 3,797 in the previous year.

Amnesty said the trend toward abolishing the death penalty continued to grow, with the number of countries conducting executions halving over the past two decades.
Mexico and Liberia are the most recent countries to abandon state execution.

However, Secretary-General Irene Khan said in a statement that the death penalty remained the "ultimate, irreversible denial of human rights".
In America according to according to Progress Report, The racial discrimination in America continue.
There is roughly an equal number of black and white murder victims in the United States each year. Yet, "80 per cent of the more than 840 people put to death in the USA since 1976 were convicted of crimes involving white victims, compared to the 13 per cent who were convicted of killing blacks." A U.S. Justice Department study found prosecutors "were almost twice as likely to seek the death penalty for black defendants accused of killing nonblack victims than for black defendants accused of killing black victims." Once a capital case is underway, prosecutors "give more white defendants than black defendants the chance to avoid a death sentence," by entering into plea bargain agreements and white defendant were "almost twice as likely as black defendants to enter into such plea agreements." During a death penalty trial "prosecutors regularly exclude black potential jurors from service." A 2003 study of jury selection in Philadelphia capital cases "revealed that prosecutors used peremptory challenges—the power to exclude potential jurors for any reason aside from race or gender—to remove 51 percent of black potential jurors while excluding only 26 percent of nonblack potential jurors." Since 1977, "[a]t least one in five of the African Americans executed...had been convicted by all-white juries."
As if that were not bad enough, we continue to kill and put on death row for years and years people that are innocent. These are human mistakes, THAT CANNOT BE TAKEN BACK. This is the problem with the Death Penalty, this is why this decision is best left up to the only one that should make it, G-d.
According to the Death Penalty Information Center "more than three dozen death row inmates have been exonerated since 2000." (Death penalty advocates don't dispute the figure. Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, said "I wouldn't say that 20 or 30 cases out of 8,000 constitutes a broken system.") In 2000, Illinois governor George Ryan (R), who supports capital punishment, declared a moratorium on the death penalty after "11 men were released from death row." (U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens noted that around the country, "DNA evidence has shown 'that a substantial number of death sentences have been imposed erroneously.'") Ryan commissioned a panel of experts to study the issue and two years later the group "released a report making 85 recommendations for improving the state's capital-punishment system." One important reform was "changes in lineup procedures to make eyewitness identifications more reliable." Another reform was "videotaping of the entire interrogation process" to avoid "circumstances under which people will confess falsely." Ryan's successor, Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D), has "pledged to continue the moratorium" until the recommendations can be implemented and their effectiveness assessed. A similar effort is now underway to improve the system in North Carolina.
As if it were not bad enough, people who face the death penalty are NOT given the best chances to survive such persecution. Shouldn’t we provide the absolute best defense to someone facing the possibility of death by us, in our names, through the state? If they are going to kill in my name, they pretty damn well sure they are killing the right person. A true defense is the only way to make sure that takes place.
Too often, indigent defendants in capital punishment cases received inadequate representation. President Bush, following up on extensive congressional efforts, acknowledged the problem in his last State of the Union address, saying "Soon I will send to Congress a proposal to fund special training for defense counsel in capital cases, because people on trial for their lives must have competent lawyers by their side." The proposal ended up being a step backwards. In Oct. 2004, President Bush signed the Justice for All Act which called for "$350 million over 5 years" to improve the representation of defendants facing the death penalty. (The bill passed with overwhelming bi-partisan support -- in the Senate by unanimous consent and in the House on a vote of 393-14) After the State of the Union, President Bush didn't fund that effort and instead budgeted "$50 million over 3 years," none of which was provided specifically "under the Justice for All Act." Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT) said "It was a step forward for the president to at last acknowledge the problem of indigent defense in state capital cases, and we welcome the president's words. But any serious commitment to addressing this problem must start with the counsel program authorized in the Justice for All Act."

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Omaha Schools Resegregated

Apparently its now ok to be seperate and unequal once again. I guess in truth, in practice this had been the case since immigrants started coming to America on boats; by choice or not.

I don’t really know what to say about this, except its disgusting… and very enlightening. Any minority person can tell you that the civil rights movement has never fully been embraced, and give the opportunity, Republicans are willing to exploit the negative stereotypes that continue to segregate our societies. Do we really expect minorities to succeed in our society when we don’t give them an equal opportunity or even a real opportunity at all to succeed? Do we really want to lie and say that there is an equal opportunity at all to succeed? Is racism really dead?

Hopefully this is just a small step back, on what is a battle not yet lost. The Article can also be found here:
A plan by Nebraska legislators to codify the effective racial segregation of Omaha city schools contains language allowing for huge disparities in funding of the newly designated districts.

When students in Maddie Fennell’s sixth-grade class asked her if Nebraska’s new bill to divide Omaha schools along racial lines meant the civil rights movement was meaningless, she did not know how to answer.

"The kids are saying, ‘Adults always tell us we should all get along together and go to school together and get to know each other’s cultures. But now they’re saying that’s not what we have to do?’" said Fennell, a teacher who has worked at predominantly black Franklin Elementary for eight years. "They’re wondering what’s going on with all of this."

The sixth-graders are not alone in their confusion. Many educators, community members and other students in Omaha’s black and Latino neighborhoods are trying to make sense of a bill that could "reorganize" the Omaha public-school district, comprised of 45,000 students, into three separate districts: one predominately white, one largely if not mostly Latino and one majority black. And while supporters of the bill argue that it would fund the three districts fairly, the legislation offers the potential for drastically unequal funding.

Nebraska lawmakers passed the bill 31–16 on April 13, and Governor Dave Heineman signed it into law the same day. The legislation came as the final answer to a nearly year-long struggle by Omaha Public Schools (OPS), ostensibly intended to determine how to create equitable education opportunities within the city’s expanding borders.

The "One City, One School District" bill that was under consideration would have enabled the Omaha school district to annex majority-white schools just outside the city, where the majority of students are people of color.
(image placeholder)

Although the legislation’s text does not mention race, even proponents acknowledge that it will define districts essentially along color line.

In the end, lawmakers opted to not only dissolve the One City, One School District plan, but to dismantle and split OPS. Each new school district will have its own school board, its own superintendent, and presumably, when the lines are drawn, its own defining racial identity.

Critics of the bill charge that it will effectively re-segregate the city. Some question its constitutionality. Although the legislation’s text does not mention race, even proponents acknowledge that it will define districts essentially along color lines. Ernie Chambers, the state’s only black senator, introduced the amendment that mandates dividing the school district.

Chambers maintains that Omaha’s schools are already effectively segregated into sections called "attendance areas," which will also guide the drawing of the new districts. "You cannot segregate something that already is," Chambers told TNS. "You cannot re-segregate something that has never ceased to be segregated. If these ‘attendance area’ boundaries don’t violate the law now, they cannot be considered to violate the law simply because you substitute the word ‘district’ for the words ‘attendance area.’"

Adding to the frustration is the fact that the lawmaker who spearheaded the amendment was a person of color.

Chambers’s reassurances appear to offer small comfort communities of color in Omaha. "People here are really up in arms about it," said Patricia Bass, who co-chairs Omaha Together One Community (OTOC). "We’re just all floored." OTOC is a multiethnic, interfaith community organization. Adding to the frustration is the fact that the lawmaker who spearheaded the amendment was a person of color.

"Being a minority, Chambers says he stands for ‘our views, our opinions, our voice,’ but how can he do that when they don’t match?" said Taylor Anderson, a bi-racial junior at Benson High School. "I don’t think that he’s representing the African-American voice in Omaha, because it’s not mine. I don’t agree whatsoever with what he’s proposing."

Chambers, who has developed a public image as a voice for the marginalized in Omaha, claims he pushed for the bill to empower communities where segregation already exists. "Here you have students sitting in a segregated school in a segregated neighborhood asking if this bill is going to bring about segregation," Chambers said. "I think it’s a little naïve, because a marginalized group will never have full control of their school," said Miguel De La Torre, a Latino-rights activist and director of the Justice and Peace Institute in Colorado. "Because of the inequality in this country along racial lines, the control of one’s school is in comparison to everything else and really misses the dynamics of how people work."

The original bill, introduced by Senator Ron Raikes, was intended to settle school-district boundary disputes. Along with Chambers’s amendment to restructure the school district, Raikes’s bill will oversee the formation of a "learning community" in which all Omaha-area school districts will pool some property-tax revenue to help fund schools in a potentially more equitable manner.

Many students fear the government-sanctioned divisions will exacerbate racial tensions in the city.

Chambers insisted the districts would be funded according to their respective "needs," but he would not elaborate for TNS on how a school’s need is to be determined or what safeguards will ensure fairness. According to TNS’s analysis of the bill, in fact, each district will be able to set its own property taxes in addition to the shared pot, assuming the to-be-determined common tax rate does not reach $1.05 per $100 of property value.

Since property values are typically higher in the predominantly white section, where homeowners can generally afford higher taxe rates, the variable tax-rate clause could potentially result in wildly disparate revenue streams for each of the three districts. Sen. Raikes confirmed TNS’s analysis, conceding, "A higher-wealth district would receive more dollars per cent of valuation than would a lower-wealth district. Yes, that’s true." Despite this disparity, Raikes insists the bill is a step toward correcting the inequalities between schools and that it makes the school districts "as equitable as you can get."

But some doubt the funding system will be beneficial. "If history is a guide for us, the black schools and the Latino schools will end up with the shorter end of the stick," De La Torre said. Ben Gray, co-chair of the African-American Achievement Council in Omaha, was one of the only people TNS spoke with who knew that the bill does not provide for equitable funding of the various school districts. "Here’s the problem: A lot of people aren’t aware of what’s going on," Gray said. "It’s such a comprehensive bill that most people aren’t aware of what it actually says."

Many students at the Omaha’s multi-ethnic Central High School are both disturbed by the bill, and angry at lawmakers for passing it. "I can’t believe it," said Esmeralda Lucero, a Latina senior at Central. "We’ve come so far. It just seems like it’s common sense, so why would they pass a bill like this?" Although students would be allowed to stay at their schools under the bill, many students fear the government-sanctioned divisions will exacerbate racial tensions in the city.

"The next step will be: you can’t cross Dodge Street because you’re Hispanic, and Dodge Street will take you to the black side," said Oscar Ortiz, a Latino senior at Central. "And you can’t cross 84th Street because that’s where white people live." Alvin Samuels, a black Central senior, said: "The bill sends the message that they’re giving up on promoting diversity. They’re dividing and segregating us off. We can’t fix it so we’re going to just go our separate ways."

Parents of students are also worried about the ramifications of the bill. "I think the inner-city kids are going to lose out on opportunities that other districts may get," said Regina Anderson, Taylor’s mother, who is black. "I think they lose out already. The schools are different. The activities are different. I think this bill is just going to make things worse instead of better."

OPS reports that a majority of students within its current boundaries live in what it considers poverty. "It’s not just a race issue; it’s a class issue," Anderson said.

Chambers, however, is adamant that the bill will give students more opportunities, not fewer. He claims the bill will foster integration by offering transportation to enable students to attend any school in the learning community with available space. He also pointed out that a task force will be established to examine issues of diversity and integration in schools.

But people like Central social-studies teacher Rod Mullen predict students of color won’t see improved access to majority-white schools. "These suburban schools can say, ‘Hey, we’d love to have you, but we don’t have any room.’" Mullen said, "Unless you’re a really good basketball player or a really good student, they won’t have room for you."

While much of the anger over the bill is directed toward Chambers, critics also note the significance of a nearly all-white, wealthy, mostly conservative legislative body passing the racially charged bill. "I think that speaks more loudly as to the intention of the bill than one individual," De La Torre said. "Whose will within that society is being legislated?"

Beyond Omaha, schools are re-segregating throughout the country. A 2006 study published by the Civil Rights Project at Harvard University found that nationwide since the 1990s, after the Supreme Court relaxed its earlier decision mandating school desegregation, the percentage of black students enrolling in predominately non-white schools increased from 66 percent in 1991 to 73 percent in 2003.

"What we’ve seen where the US Supreme Court’s 1954 desegregation orders have been dismantled is a return to segregated schools that often have high poverty rates, less teachers, less parental involvement and a higher drop-out rate," said Chungmei Lee, co-author of the report. "Once schools get re-segregated, there’s a whole host of factors such as this that make these schools unequal."

Despite court blessings for rolling back desegregation efforts, many critics of the Nebraska bill still question its legality. "It’s questionable whether this is even constitutional," Lee said. "I feel strongly that this will be contested." Meanwhile, community members in Omaha aren’t giving up on working toward diversity. "When Senator Chambers says we’re already segregated – true – I’m not going to argue with him," Fennell said. "But does that mean we just give up and stop the fight? Or does that mean that we dig in double hard and we as a community really look at ourselves and say, we’ve got to change this?"

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

Net Neutrality

Net Neutrality the buzz word for what is essentially my right to keep this blog.

See communications corporations, who use our federally funded phone lines and cable lines, dug underground and placed high atop polls with our money, want to use the technology created by our government to make even more money.

They want to charge sites money for access. So to access my page faster, or even at all, I would have to pay each communications corporation so that you the reader could access my page. It’s explained here:
In a move long sought by large telecommunications companies, conservative lawmakers in the United States are pushing for new legislation that critics say would undermine the ability of Internet users to freely access any website, from the lowliest weblog to the fanciest corporate home page.

Despite strong opposition from Democratic politicians and consumer groups, the House Commerce Committee this week endorsed the proposed bill, called the Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act, or COPE. If passed by Congress, the proposed bill would allow giant telecoms like ATT and Verizon to charge extra fees for faster access to certain web sites, a move that many believe would harm free expression and innovation — considered core principles of the Internet.
This is just a despicable act that is trying to be pushed through the house of reps. The corporations have lots of money going into destroying the fabric of our internet, but with awareness rising, hopefully we can stop it.

The New York Times has always weighed in here with a brilliant Editorial:
"Net neutrality" is a concept that is still unfamiliar to most Americans, but it keeps the Internet democratic. Cable and telephone companies that provide Internet service are talking about creating a two-tiered Internet, in which Web sites that pay them large fees would get priority over everything else. Opponents of these plans are supporting Net-neutrality legislation, which would require all Web sites to be treated equally. Net neutrality recently suffered a setback in the House, but there is growing hope that the Senate will take up the cause.

One of the Internet's great strengths is that a single blogger or a small political group can inexpensively create a Web page that is just as accessible to the world as Microsoft's home page. But this democratic Internet would be in danger if the companies that deliver Internet service changed the rules so that Web sites that pay them money would be easily paccessible, while little-guy sites would be harder to access, and slower to navigate. Providers could also block access to sites they do not like.

That would be a financial windfall for Internet service providers, but a disaster for users, who could find their Web browsing influenced by whichever sites paid their service provider the most money. There is a growing movement of Internet users who are pushing for legislation to make this kind of discrimination impossible. It has attracted supporters ranging from MoveOn.org to the Gun Owners of America. Grass-roots political groups like these are rightly concerned that their online speech could be curtailed if Internet service providers were allowed to pick and choose among Web sites.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee defeated a good Net-neutrality amendment last week. But the amendment got more votes than many people expected, suggesting that support for Net neutrality is beginning to take hold in Congress. In the Senate, Olympia Snowe, a Maine Republican, and Byron Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat, are drafting a strong Net-neutrality bill that would prohibit broadband providers from creating a two-tiered Internet. Senators who care about the Internet and Internet users should get behind it.
Also please go here, to find out more info or what you can do.

Keeping the internet free should be a no brainer

Monday, May 01, 2006

Mayday Protests

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Today in the US, hundreds of thousands of people have walked off their jobs demanding they are treated as humans, and given an opportunity to become American citizens. I think it was a fabulous idea that people in America are forced to see how our everyday lives are affected and enhanced by these undocumented citizens. As AP reported:
From Los Angeles to Chicago, New Orleans to Houston, the "Day Without Immigrants" attracted widespread participation despite divisions among activists over whether a boycott would send the right message to Washington lawmakers considering sweeping immigration reform.
There is no question that people taking a day off to highlight their importance to the American community was a good thing. Let Corporations and Republicans know immigrants from across the globe ARE the framework of this great country and have been.
"We are the backbone of what America is, legal or illegal, it doesn't matter," said Melanie Lugo, who was among thousands attending a rally in Denver with her husband and their third-grade daughter. "We butter each other's bread. They need us as much as we need them."
As I have stated before on this website, here, bringing these immigrants into the fold will not only help them, but will bring them under US work place regulations which will raise wages, decrease health care costs as the primary provider are emergency rooms, and bring dignity to work where to often these workers are treated without respect.

But the world is rocking, and across the globe today, Mayday, the people of the world are demanding more of their governments. More of the plutocracies, the political and corporate elite which continue to rape them of their human rights. Today people have been rising up to demand more. BBC reports:
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Hundreds of thousands of people have joined May Day rallies across Asia, with protests sparking high alerts in the Philippines and Indonesia.

In the Philippine capital Manila police stopped thousands from reaching the presidential palace amid fears rallies would become anti-government protests.

In Indonesia, tens of thousands rallied against a planned labour law they say will undermine workers' rights.

Strong protest rallies were also held in Japan, Taiwan and Cambodia.
These governments should be scared of their people, because they have been neglecting them for so long, while they are getting rich. The growing pot of discontent around the world, at least today seemed to be rocking this globe at its seems, and what a wonderful thing.

In Bolivia the government has reclaimed its natural gas industry, not because it is against private industry, but because the government has a duty to step in, when the market is being corrupted by oligopolic companies. These companies and political elite were using the people’s resources to enrich themselves, the people spoke and they want it to enrich their society.

Today is a good day for democracy and freedom, the people are speaking and it’s a lovely sound.